Five-Step Decision Making Process Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Five-Step Decision Making litigate - Essay ExampleIn case of recruitment and selection, ethical decision making plays a lively role to find the outflank chance for the designation under consideration. However, there are a fig of ways in which the decisions are deteriorated by other staff, family members, friends, relatives and existing employees. Human resource managers need to cautiously formulate their criteria to the selection process. Every candidate should be assessed according to the qualification, skills, interview results and experience rather than on the basis of his reference or source. This paper evaluates the given scenario applying The 5 steps Process for Making respectable Decisions. The five step process which guide towards making an ethical decision regarding issues in the business starts from the realisation of the caper. In the given scenario, there is a clear indication of attainable unethical judgment repayable to someoneal interest and influence of oth ers. The co-workers statement whitethorn affect the decision of the hiring process. The problem of unethical and unjust decisions may harm the reputation of the company and such a decision may also not be in the best interest of the business. It is firstly unethical to reject candidates who best suit the position under consideration. ... The second step is to identify the alternative choice that a person can gather in. Applying it on the given scenario there are three main alternatives I can take 1. Hire the best candidate 2. Leap back and give the power of selection to other higher-ranking 3. Hire that candidate which is friend of my co-worker The identification of the alternatives alone is not sufficient to help in making an ethical decision. It is now required to evaluate the alternatives in order to select the best possible candidate for the position. If I go for the first choice and do hire the best candidate accordingly my colleague would take it wrongly and it may affect o ur relationship. But the best candidate can be a valuable asset to our makeup. As a responsible employee of my organization it is the best choice for me. If I select the second option and leap back and delegate or request the selection to be done by other individual say my senior then however my colleague would dumb be dissatisfied with me but still it would not harm the relationship much in the recollective run. Finally, if I do hire that candidate which is a friend of my colleague then both the organization needs and my colleague would be satisfied. I personally believe that I should go for the best candidate for the designation under consideration in terms of qualifications, experience and skills. This will be a smear difficult to satisfy the co-worker however, it will help the organization run successfully in the persistent run. Job of hiring is a very bonafide job and it requires higher level of professional skepticism. Hiring is the process which must divulge greater lev el of ethical decision making. It will be unethical to avoid any